Anker 575 vs Anker 568 - USB-C Dock Comparison 2026

Anker 575 vs Anker 568: Two USB-C Docks, Two Different Philosophies

Anker’s docking station lineup is one of the most popular on Amazon, and the 575 and 568 sit close together in the catalog - close enough in price and name that buyers often wonder which one to get. The short answer: they are built for different kinds of users.

The Anker 575 is a 13-port USB-C dock that prioritizes breadth. It packs in SD card readers, an audio jack, triple display output on Windows, and solid 85W charging at $249.99. It works on both Windows and Mac (with display limitations on Mac). The Anker 568 is an 11-port USB4 dock that prioritizes depth - faster 40 Gbps upstream bandwidth, 100W charging, and stronger multi-4K display performance on Windows. It drops the audio jack, card readers, and Mac support entirely, and costs $299.99.

The short verdict: The Anker 575 wins for most buyers. Its broader compatibility, more practical port selection, and lower price make it the more versatile choice. The Anker 568 only makes more sense if you need 100W charging or USB4 bandwidth and work exclusively on Windows.

For context on where either dock fits in the broader market, see our docking station buying guide.

Quick Specs Comparison

Design and Build

Both docks come from the same manufacturer and share a similar visual language - matte plastic chassis, no frills, compact footprint. The Anker 575 is slightly wider with its 13 ports distributed across front and rear panels. The Anker 568 has a flatter, more minimal form factor measuring 209 x 79 x 32mm, with all USB-A ports on the rear and two USB-C ports on the front.

One convenience difference worth noting: the 568 puts its two USB-C ports on the front with 30W charging each, making them practical for keeping a phone or tablet charged during the day without reaching around to the back. The 575 also has front-facing ports, but the arrangement is less convenient for frequent device swapping.

Neither dock has a standout build quality advantage. Both use similar plastic construction, and both include a 1m cable in the box. The 568 includes a Kensington NanoSave security slot, which the 575 lacks - useful in shared office environments.

Design winner: Tie. Similar quality and form factor. The 568 has a more purposeful front-panel layout; the 575 fits more into its chassis overall.

Port Comparison

USB Connectivity

The Anker 575 gives you two USB-C 3.2 ports (one with 18W charging, one data-only) and three USB-A 3.1 ports - five total USB downstream ports. The Anker 568 provides two USB-C 3.2 ports (each with 30W charging) and four USB-A ports (two USB-A 3.1 at 5 Gbps, two USB-A 2.0 at 480 Mbps) - six downstream USB ports, but the two USB 2.0 ports are only useful for low-bandwidth devices like keyboards and mice, not external drives.

On raw port count the docks are comparable, but port quality differs. The 568’s front USB-C ports are faster chargers (30W vs 18W), but two of its USB-A ports are the slow USB 2.0 standard. The 575’s USB-A ports are all USB 3.1, which is more useful when you need to plug in flash drives or external storage on a port-by-port basis.

Video Outputs

Both docks support triple display on Windows, but they achieve it differently. The Anker 575 uses two HDMI 2.0 outputs and one DisplayPort 1.4, which is convenient for users with HDMI monitors. The Anker 568 uses one HDMI 2.0 and two DisplayPort 1.4 outputs, which is better for users with DisplayPort monitors or those who need DisplayPort’s bandwidth for higher resolution output.

The more significant difference is resolution capability. The Anker 568’s USB4 upstream gives it enough bandwidth to drive dual 4K@60Hz or triple 4K@30Hz. The Anker 575’s USB-C 10 Gbps link cannot push dual 4K@60Hz simultaneously with its full 13-port bandwidth, capping triple display output at triple 1080p@60Hz or dual 1440p@60Hz.

If you want two 4K monitors at full 60Hz on a single dock, the Anker 568 handles it better.

Card Readers and Audio

This is where the Anker 575 wins decisively. It includes SD and microSD card readers (UHS-I speed) and a 3.5mm combo audio jack. The Anker 568 has neither. If you are a photographer, videographer, or anyone who regularly pulls files off a camera card, the 575 is the clear choice. Likewise, if you want to use wired headphones or a headset through the dock, the 575 is the only option here.

Adding these features externally would mean sacrificing a USB-A port on the 568, and you would still need to buy a USB card reader and USB audio adapter - adding $20-40 and reducing available ports.

Port winner: Anker 575. More practical USB-A ports, SD card readers, and audio jack. The 568 wins on raw display bandwidth and faster USB-C charging, but loses overall port utility.

Display Support

The Anker 568 is the clear winner for demanding Windows multi-monitor setups. Its USB4 40 Gbps upstream gives it the bandwidth to drive two 4K@60Hz monitors simultaneously, and it can stretch to three 4K monitors if you accept 30Hz refresh rates.

The Anker 575 tops out at single 4K@60Hz, or two 1440p monitors at 60Hz, or three 1080p monitors at 60Hz on Windows. These are good numbers for most home office setups but fall short for 4K-heavy workflows.

On macOS, both docks are limited to a single extended display. The Anker 575 works on Mac; the Anker 568 is not recommended by Anker for Mac at all. Neither is a practical choice for Mac users who need more than one display.

For deeper context on display connectivity: USB-C vs Thunderbolt Docking Stations.

Display winner: Anker 568 (for Windows users who need dual or triple 4K). Anker 575 wins for Mac users by default, and is sufficient for single or basic dual-monitor Windows setups.

Power Delivery

The Anker 568 delivers 100W of USB-C Power Delivery to the host laptop. The Anker 575 delivers 85W. Both are adequate for most laptops, but there is a meaningful practical difference for larger machines.

A 16-inch MacBook Pro or a 15-inch gaming laptop may need 90-100W to charge at full speed while under load. The Anker 575’s 85W may cause these machines to charge slowly or draw down the battery during intensive tasks. The Anker 568’s 100W handles them comfortably.

For 13-14 inch laptops - including most ultrabooks - 85W is more than sufficient, and the practical difference between the two docks is negligible.

Power delivery winner: Anker 568. 100W vs 85W is a real advantage for users with power-hungry 15-16 inch laptops.

macOS Compatibility

This is one of the most important differences between these two docks, and it is largely overlooked in shopping decisions.

The Anker 575 works with Mac. You get a single extended display via DisplayPort Alt Mode, plus all the USB, Ethernet, and audio functionality. The SD card readers work. It is not a perfect Mac experience - no dual display, no UHS-II speeds - but it is functional and broadly compatible with MacBooks.

The Anker 568 does not work with Mac per Anker’s own documentation. Multi-display output will not function on macOS, and other features may behave unreliably. Anker explicitly recommends against using this dock with MacBooks. This is a hard stop: if you use a MacBook now or might switch in the future, the 568 is off the table.

macOS winner: Anker 575, by elimination.

Pricing and Value

The Anker 575 delivers more ports at a lower price per port. Factor in the integrated SD card readers and audio jack (which would cost $25-40 to add externally to the 568), and the value gap widens further. The 568 asks for $50 more at MSRP and delivers a faster upstream connection and better charging, but removes several practical features.

For most buyers, the Anker 575 is the better value. The Anker 568 makes more sense if you specifically need 100W charging or the USB4 bandwidth for high-speed USB4 storage devices.

Both are often discounted significantly on Amazon - check current prices before making a decision.

Value winner: Anker 575. More features, lower price, broader compatibility.

Verdict: Anker 575 Wins for Most Users

The Anker 575 is the better all-around USB-C dock for most buyers. It has more ports, SD card readers, an audio jack, Mac compatibility, and costs less. Its USB-C 10 Gbps upstream is a real limitation for heavy dual-4K setups on Windows, but for the majority of home office users with standard display needs, it covers everything without compromise.

The Anker 568 earns its place for a specific buyer: a Windows-only user with a power-hungry laptop who wants USB4 bandwidth and dual 4K@60Hz display support. If that description fits you, the 568 is worth the premium.

Choose the Anker 575 if:

• You use a Mac (or might switch to Mac in the future)
• You need SD card readers or a headphone jack built into the dock
• You have a 13-14 inch laptop and 85W charging is sufficient
• You want the best value and most ports for your money
• Your display setup is single 4K or dual 1080p/1440p

Choose the Anker 568 if:

• You are exclusively on Windows with no plans to change
• You have a 15-16 inch laptop that benefits from 100W charging
• You need dual 4K@60Hz monitors from a single USB-C connection
• You have USB4 storage devices and want full 40 Gbps throughput
• You do not need a card reader or audio jack on the dock itself

For more options in this price range, see our Anker 575 vs Anker 577 comparison and the full best docking stations under $300 guide.