This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Read our affiliate disclosure.
Plugable TBT3-UDZ vs TBT4-UDZ - Thunderbolt Dock Comparison 2026
| Specification | Plugable TBT3-UDZ | Plugable TBT4-UDZ |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.8/10 | 8/10 |
| Connection | Thunderbolt 3 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Max Data Rate | 40 Gbps | 40 Gbps |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4 |
| Driver | Native | Native |
| USB Ports | 7 | 7 |
| Video Ports | 4 | 4 |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| Card Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Power Delivery | 96W | 98W |
| Power Input | DC-barrel | DC-barrel |
| MSRP | $239.95 | $419 |
Plugable TBT3-UDZ vs TBT4-UDZ: Same Idea, Newer Thunderbolt Platform
The Plugable TBT3-UDZ and Plugable TBT4-UDZ are built around the same basic promise: one Thunderbolt cable, native displays without DisplayLink drivers, flexible HDMI and DisplayPort outputs, laptop charging, Ethernet, card readers, and enough USB ports for a real desk. The difference is generation. The TBT3-UDZ is a Thunderbolt 3 and USB-C dock from 2020, while the TBT4-UDZ is Plugable’s newer Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 model from 2023.
The short verdict: the Plugable TBT4-UDZ wins for most buyers in 2026. It has the better overall score, newer Thunderbolt 4 host connection, support for up to four 4K@60Hz displays on compatible Windows laptops, 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet, UHS-II SD and microSD readers, and slightly higher host charging. The TBT3-UDZ is still worth considering if you find it discounted and only need dual 4K@60Hz, especially if you like having two HDMI ports and two DisplayPort outputs for easy monitor matching.
If you are still deciding whether Thunderbolt is worth paying for, start with our USB-C vs Thunderbolt docking stations guide. For a broader shortlist, see our best Thunderbolt 4 docking stations guide.
Quick Specs Comparison
| Feature | Plugable TBT3-UDZ | Plugable TBT4-UDZ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $239.95 | $419.00 |
| Our Score | 7.8/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Release Window | 2020-09 | 2023-01 |
| Host Connection | Thunderbolt 3 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Max Data Rate | 40 Gbps | 40 Gbps |
| Drivers Required | None | None |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4 |
| Best Display Mode | Dual 4K@60Hz on TB3, TB4, or USB4 | Quad 4K@60Hz on compatible TB4 or USB4 Windows laptops |
| USB-C Fallback | Dual 1080p@60Hz or single 4K@30Hz on compatible USB-C hosts | Not positioned as a USB-C fallback dock |
| Video Outputs | 2x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| USB Ports | 1x USB-C 3.1, 1x USB-A 3.1, 5x USB-A 3.0 | 1x USB-C 3.2, 3x USB-A 3.2, 2x USB-A 3.0, 1x USB-A 2.0 |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbps | 1 Gbps and 2.5 Gbps listed |
| Card Readers | SD, microSD | SD UHS-II, microSD UHS-II |
| Audio | 3.5mm combo | 3.5mm combo |
| Host Charging | 96W | 98W |
| Cable Included | 0.8m Thunderbolt 3 | 1.0m Thunderbolt 4 |
| Warranty | 24 months limited | 24 months limited |
Display Support: Dual 4K vs Quad 4K
Display support is the biggest practical difference between these docks.
The TBT3-UDZ supports up to two external displays. On Thunderbolt 3, Thunderbolt 4, or USB4 hosts, it can run dual 4K@60Hz using any two of its HDMI 2.0 or DisplayPort outputs. That last part matters. The four physical video connectors are not for four monitors. They are there so you can choose HDMI or DisplayPort for either of the two supported displays without buying adapters. If your monitors are both HDMI, use both HDMI ports. If they are both DisplayPort, use both DisplayPort outputs. If you have one of each, mix them.
The TBT4-UDZ uses the same basic physical video layout, 2x HDMI 2.0 and 2x DisplayPort 1.2, but it can drive more screens when the host is capable. Its top configuration is quad 4K@60Hz through all four video outputs on compatible Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 Windows laptops with DP 1.4 HBR3 DSC support. On Thunderbolt 3 systems, it drops to dual 4K. On Mac, it supports dual 4K@60Hz on M1 Pro/Max and later systems plus newer M4 and M5 MacBook Air and Pro models, while base M1 and M2 MacBooks are limited to one external display.
That makes the TBT4-UDZ the obvious choice for Windows users building a three-monitor or four-monitor workstation. It is also the safer long-term choice if you expect to replace your laptop with a Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 machine. The TBT3-UDZ is still enough for a normal dual-monitor desk, and it has one useful fallback: compatible non-Thunderbolt USB-C laptops can use it at reduced display capability, up to dual 1080p@60Hz or one 4K@30Hz.
Display winner: Plugable TBT4-UDZ. The TBT3-UDZ is fine for dual 4K, but the TBT4-UDZ adds a real quad-display ceiling for compatible Windows laptops.
Thunderbolt Version and Host Compatibility
Both docks use a 40 Gbps host link, but the host platform is different. The TBT3-UDZ is a Thunderbolt 3 dock with USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode fallback. The TBT4-UDZ is a Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 dock.
For many two-monitor desk setups, raw bandwidth alone does not tell the story. A good Thunderbolt 3 dock can still be fast, stable, and useful. The TBT3-UDZ proves that with dual 4K support, seven USB data ports, Ethernet, audio, card readers, and 96W charging. It also has broader fallback behavior for USB-C-only systems, although those systems lose the dual 4K advantage.
Thunderbolt 4 matters more for buyers who want a current platform and stronger minimum host capabilities. The TBT4-UDZ is designed around Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 systems, and its flagship quad-display mode depends on a modern Windows laptop with the right DisplayPort and DSC support. It is not just a label change. If your laptop is Thunderbolt 4 and you want to use that platform for a display-heavy desk, the TBT4-UDZ uses that host capability better.
Neither dock requires DisplayLink. That is important if you want native display output without the CPU overhead, compression behavior, app permission prompts, or protected-content limitations that can come with DisplayLink docks. If you specifically need multiple external displays on a base M1 or M2 Mac, neither of these is the workaround. You would need a DisplayLink dock instead, such as a model from our best docking stations for dual monitors list.
Host platform winner: Plugable TBT4-UDZ. The TBT3-UDZ remains useful on older Thunderbolt and compatible USB-C systems, but the TBT4-UDZ is the better match for current Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 laptops.
Port Selection: Similar Layout, Better Details on the TBT4-UDZ
At a glance, the two docks look closely related. Both provide two HDMI outputs, two DisplayPort outputs, Ethernet, a 3.5mm combo audio jack, SD and microSD readers, multiple USB-A ports, one USB-C data port, an included cable, and a vertical stand. Neither dock includes downstream Thunderbolt ports for daisy-chaining, which is a meaningful limitation if you use Thunderbolt storage or want to connect a Thunderbolt monitor through the dock.
The TBT3-UDZ has seven USB data ports: one USB-C 3.1 port, one USB-A 3.1 port with 7.5W charging, and five USB-A 3.0 ports. That is a strong layout for older desks with lots of USB-A peripherals. It also includes Gigabit Ethernet, SD and microSD card readers, and 3.5mm combo audio. For keyboards, mice, webcams, USB microphones, external hard drives, and card imports, it covers the basics well.
The TBT4-UDZ also has seven USB ports, but the mix changes: one USB-C 3.2, three USB-A 3.2, two USB-A 3.0, and one USB-A 2.0. The USB-A 2.0 port is best for low-bandwidth devices like keyboards or wireless dongles, not storage. The bigger gains are elsewhere. Its Ethernet entry includes 2.5 Gigabit support, which is a practical upgrade if you use a NAS, fast local file transfers, or a 2.5GbE router or switch. Its SD and microSD card readers are both listed as UHS-II at 312 MB/s, while the TBT3-UDZ YAML only lists SD and microSD without a speed field.
Both docks use HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.2 for physical video outputs. That is enough for 4K@60Hz productivity displays, but it is not the best fit for high-refresh gaming monitors, HDMI 2.1 features, VRR, or displays that need newer DisplayPort features. The TBT4-UDZ YAML calls this out directly as a con. If you are buying for spreadsheets, coding, browsing, and office work, that limitation is usually fine. If you are building a gaming desk, neither dock is the ideal center of the setup.
Port winner: Plugable TBT4-UDZ. The count is similar, but 2.5GbE, UHS-II card reader speeds, newer USB versions, and quad-display routing give it the better overall port package.
Power Delivery and Desk Setup
Power delivery is close. The TBT3-UDZ delivers 96W of certified host charging. The TBT4-UDZ delivers 98W. In daily use, that 2W gap is not the reason to buy one over the other. Both figures are strong enough for many 15-inch and 16-inch laptops under normal workloads, and both let you leave the laptop charger in a bag.
There are two caveats. First, the TBT4-UDZ YAML notes that its 135W power brick may throttle laptop charging to around 60W when many high-power USB devices are connected. That does not mean it always charges at 60W. It means heavy accessory load can reduce available headroom. Second, the TBT3-UDZ’s verdict describes it as a heavy desk-focused design rather than a portable dock. That is true of the category in general. These are permanent desk anchors, not travel hubs.
Cable layout also differs. The TBT3-UDZ includes a 0.8m certified Thunderbolt 3 cable. The TBT4-UDZ includes a 1.0m Thunderbolt 4 cable, which gives a little more placement flexibility. However, the TBT4-UDZ has a front-mounted host port, and Plugable’s own review data in the YAML flags cable management as a drawback. If a cable exiting the front of the dock will annoy you, the newer model may require more careful placement.
Power winner: Plugable TBT4-UDZ, narrowly. It has 98W instead of 96W and a longer cable, but the practical charging difference is small.
Reliability and Known Trade-Offs
The TBT3-UDZ has the advantage of being a mature legacy model. Its YAML calls it practical and flexible, with no DisplayLink driver requirement, a useful vertical stand, and enough ports for most desks. The main concerns are age and host limits. Plugable positions it below the newer TBT4-UDZ, USB-C-only systems lose the dual 4K advantage, base M1 and M2 Macs support only one external display, and there is no downstream Thunderbolt port for daisy-chaining. Common issues include occasional display wake problems and older macOS Big Sur display or Ethernet sleep regressions.
The TBT4-UDZ brings stronger specs, but its YAML is also clear about the weak spots. Some reviewers reported occasional display disconnections and stability issues. The microSD card slot spring mechanism is described as fiddly. The front-mounted host port can complicate cable management. There are no downstream Thunderbolt 4 ports, only USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 for data. The video outputs are HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.2, not HDMI 2.1 or newer DisplayPort.
That balance matters because the TBT4-UDZ is not a perfect upgrade in every way. It is more capable, but it is also more ambitious. Quad 4K support depends on the right Windows host. Firmware updates are available through Plugable’s Windows utility, which is helpful for PC users but less convenient if you are Mac-only. If your current TBT3-UDZ works reliably and you only run two monitors, upgrading just to have a newer dock may not be necessary.
Reliability winner: depends on your setup. The TBT3-UDZ is simpler and mature. The TBT4-UDZ is more capable but has more documented edge cases around display stability and cable layout.
Value: Cheaper Legacy Dock or Newer Flagship?
The MSRP gap is large: $239.95 for the TBT3-UDZ versus $419.00 for the TBT4-UDZ. At full MSRP, the TBT4-UDZ asks you to pay much more for Thunderbolt 4, quad-display capability, 2.5GbE, faster card readers, and a newer platform. That premium makes sense if you will actually use those features. It makes less sense if you only need two 4K displays and Gigabit Ethernet.
The TBT3-UDZ’s best value case is a discounted purchase for a two-monitor desk. It supports dual 4K@60Hz on Thunderbolt 3, Thunderbolt 4, and USB4 hosts, has seven USB data ports, includes both HDMI and DisplayPort options, and charges at 96W. If that is your whole requirement list, paying more for quad-display support you will not use is unnecessary.
The TBT4-UDZ’s best value case is a high-end Windows workstation. If your laptop supports the required Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 display pipeline, running up to four 4K displays from one native dock is a meaningful feature. Add 2.5GbE and UHS-II card readers, and it becomes a stronger desk hub for analysts, developers, finance users, and creators with many screens.
Value winner: conditional. The TBT3-UDZ wins if discounted and used for dual 4K. The TBT4-UDZ wins if you need the features that make it different.
Verdict: Buy the TBT4-UDZ Unless the TBT3-UDZ Is Discounted
The Plugable TBT4-UDZ is the better dock overall. It earns the higher score, uses the newer Thunderbolt 4 platform, supports more displays on compatible Windows laptops, offers faster Ethernet, lists UHS-II card reader speeds, includes a longer Thunderbolt 4 cable, and raises host charging from 96W to 98W. Those are enough factual advantages to make it the winner.
The Plugable TBT3-UDZ is not obsolete for everyone. It remains a practical Thunderbolt 3 dock with excellent monitor connector flexibility, native dual 4K output, no DisplayLink driver requirement, 96W charging, and a useful port mix. Its problem is positioning. Plugable’s own YAML description calls it a legacy product replaced by the newer TBT4-UDZ. If prices are close, the newer dock is the safer buy.
Choose the Plugable TBT4-UDZ if:
- You have a Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 Windows laptop that can use quad 4K@60Hz
- You want the newer Plugable flagship rather than a legacy Thunderbolt 3 model
- You need 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet for faster local networking
- You want UHS-II SD and microSD card readers
- You need dual 4K on a supported Mac and prefer the newer platform
- You can work around the front host cable and lack of downstream Thunderbolt ports
Choose the Plugable TBT3-UDZ if:
- You find it at a strong discount below the TBT4-UDZ
- You only need one or two external displays
- You want a Thunderbolt dock with both HDMI and DisplayPort options built in
- You have a Thunderbolt 3 laptop and do not need Thunderbolt 4-specific capabilities
- You want USB-C fallback behavior for reduced display modes on compatible non-Thunderbolt laptops
- You do not need 2.5GbE, UHS-II card reader speeds, or four-display support
For the full product breakdowns, read our Plugable TBT3-UDZ review and Plugable TBT4-UDZ review. If you want to compare Plugable against other premium options, see CalDigit TS4 vs Plugable TBT4-UDZ and our docking station buying guide.