This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Read our affiliate disclosure.
Targus DOCK570USZ vs WAVLINK WL69PD25pro - DisplayLink Dock Comparison 2026
| Specification | Targus DOCK570USZ | WAVLINK WL69PD25pro |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Connection | USB-C | USB-C |
| Max Data Rate | 5 Gbps | N/A |
| Max Displays | 4 | 3 |
| Driver | DisplayLink | DisplayLink |
| USB Ports | 5 | 6 |
| Video Ports | 8 | 5 |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| Card Reader | No | No |
| Power Delivery | 100W | 100W |
| Power Input | DC-barrel | DC-barrel |
| MSRP | $482.99 | $152.99 |
Targus DOCK570USZ vs WAVLINK WL69PD25pro: Two DisplayLink Docks, Very Different Price Tags
The Targus DOCK570USZ and WAVLINK WL69PD25pro both solve the same fundamental problem - running multiple 4K external monitors from any USB-C laptop using DisplayLink technology - but they approach it at wildly different price points and with different display ceilings. The Targus pushes for a maximum of four simultaneous 4K displays with eight video output ports and an enterprise feature set at $482.99. The WAVLINK targets three 4K displays with five video ports at $152.99. Both require DisplayLink drivers, both deliver 100W of power to your laptop, and both work with Apple Silicon Macs that normally restrict external display count.
The short verdict: The WAVLINK WL69PD25pro is the better buy for most users. At less than a third of the Targus’s price, it delivers triple 4K@60Hz, 100W charging, faster USB-C ports, and a newer DisplayLink chipset. The Targus DOCK570USZ only makes sense if you specifically need four external 4K monitors or enterprise management features for a large deployment.
If you are still deciding which type of docking station is right for your setup, our docking station buying guide covers the fundamentals.
Quick Specs Comparison
| Feature | Targus DOCK570USZ | WAVLINK WL69PD25pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $482.99 | $152.99 |
| Release Date | July 2019 | May 2025 |
| Host Connection | USB-C (5 Gbps) | USB-C (USB4/TB compatible) |
| Max Displays | 4x 4K@60Hz | 3x 4K@60Hz |
| Video Outputs | 4x DP 1.2 + 4x HDMI 2.0 | 2x DP 1.4 + 3x HDMI 2.0 |
| Power Delivery | 100W USB-C PD | 100W USB-C PD |
| USB-A Ports | 4x USB-A 3.2 | 4x USB-A 3.2 |
| USB-C Ports | 1x USB-C 3.2 (5 Gbps) | 2x USB-C 3.1 (10 Gbps) |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbps | 1 Gbps |
| Audio | 3.5mm combo | 3.5mm combo |
| SD Card Reader | None | None |
| Driver | DisplayLink (dual DL-6910) | DisplayLink |
| Warranty | 3 years | 1 year |
| Our Score | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
Display Output: Quad 4K vs Triple 4K
This is the core difference between these two docks and the main reason the Targus commands a premium.
Targus DOCK570USZ
The DOCK570USZ packs eight video outputs - four DisplayPort 1.2 and four HDMI 2.0 - powered by dual DisplayLink DL-6910 chips. It supports up to four simultaneous 4K@60Hz displays via the DisplayPort outputs, or quad 4K@50Hz via HDMI. You can also push a single display to 5K@60Hz using one of the DisplayPort outputs. The sheer number of video ports means you can mix and match cable types without adapters, which is useful in office environments where monitors vary.
WAVLINK WL69PD25pro
The WL69PD25pro provides five video outputs - three HDMI 2.0 and two DisplayPort 1.4 - supporting up to three simultaneous 4K@60Hz displays. The DisplayPort 1.4 spec is newer than the Targus’s DP 1.2, offering higher theoretical bandwidth, though in a DisplayLink configuration the practical difference is minimal since all rendering goes through software compression regardless.
The Real Question: Do You Need Four Monitors?
For most productivity workflows - coding, document editing, web research, communication tools - three 4K monitors plus a laptop screen is already an enormous amount of screen real estate. The fourth monitor matters for specific use cases: financial trading desks with multiple data feeds, surveillance monitoring, or specialized enterprise workflows where every pixel of screen space is accounted for.
If three displays are enough, the WAVLINK saves you $330 while covering your needs.
Display winner: Targus DOCK570USZ for raw capability. But the WAVLINK’s three displays are sufficient for the vast majority of users.
Port Selection
USB Connectivity
Both docks offer four USB-A 3.2 ports, putting them on equal footing for standard peripherals like keyboards, mice, and USB drives.
The difference is in USB-C. The WAVLINK WL69PD25pro includes two USB-C 3.1 ports at 10 Gbps, doubling the bandwidth available for fast external storage compared to the Targus. The DOCK570USZ has one USB-C 3.2 port at 5 Gbps. If you regularly connect USB-C SSDs or NVMe enclosures, the WAVLINK’s faster ports are a meaningful upgrade.
Networking and Audio
Both docks feature Gigabit Ethernet and a 3.5mm combo audio jack. Neither includes an SD or microSD card reader, which is a common complaint at both price points.
Enterprise Features (Targus Only)
The Targus DOCK570USZ includes enterprise-specific tools: Wi-Fi Auto Switch (disables Wi-Fi when Ethernet connects), MAC Address Cloning (for network authentication environments), and Ghost Device Removal (cleans stale registry entries). It also supports VESA mounting and has a Kensington lock slot. The WAVLINK has none of these enterprise features.
Port winner: Split. The WAVLINK has faster USB-C ports. The Targus has enterprise management tools. For a typical home office, the WAVLINK’s port selection is more useful. For IT departments, the Targus extras justify themselves.
Power Delivery
Both docks deliver 100W of USB-C Power Delivery to the connected laptop, which is enough to charge most 13-inch to 16-inch laptops at full speed. The Targus uses an external DC barrel power adapter, and so does the WAVLINK (which ships with a 160W brick to accommodate the 100W passthrough plus dock operation).
Neither dock has an advantage here. Both charge your laptop at the same rate.
Power delivery winner: Tie. 100W on both sides.
Build Quality and Design
Targus DOCK570USZ
The DOCK570USZ is a sizable dock at 8.2 x 3.5 x 1.7 inches and 1.5 pounds. The build is solid with a professional look suited to corporate environments. At nearly six years old (released July 2019), the industrial design feels dated compared to newer docks, but the hardware holds up well. The 3-year warranty provides meaningful coverage for enterprise deployments.
WAVLINK WL69PD25pro
The WL69PD25pro is a newer design (May 2025) and benefits from more modern aesthetics. However, WAVLINK is a less established brand than Targus in the docking station space, and the dock only carries a 1-year warranty - the shortest in this comparison. Long-term reliability data is limited given the product’s recent release.
Build winner: Targus DOCK570USZ. The longer warranty and established brand track record give it the edge in confidence, even if the design is older.
Compatibility
Both docks work with Windows, macOS, and ChromeOS through DisplayLink. The Targus adds official Android and Linux Ubuntu support, making it the broader compatibility play. WAVLINK does not officially support Linux at all.
Both docks work with Apple Silicon MacBooks to bypass the native external display limitation. The Targus pushes it further with four external 4K displays on an M-series Mac, while the WAVLINK provides three.
On macOS, both require the DisplayLink Manager driver and Screen Recording permission in System Settings. On Windows, both require the DisplayLink USB Graphics driver. Neither dock provides plug-and-play display output.
Compatibility winner: Targus DOCK570USZ. Broader OS support including Linux and Android.
Pricing and Value
This is where the comparison becomes lopsided. The Targus DOCK570USZ at $482.99 costs more than three times the WAVLINK WL69PD25pro at $152.99. The price per video output breaks down to roughly $60 per port for the Targus versus $31 per port for the WAVLINK. The price per supported display is $121 for the Targus versus $51 for the WAVLINK.
The Targus’s premium buys you exactly two things: one additional 4K display and enterprise management features. If you need neither, spending an extra $330 is hard to justify.
The WAVLINK also brings newer hardware to the table - DisplayPort 1.4 outputs, faster 10 Gbps USB-C ports, and a more recent chipset design. The Targus is running 2019-era hardware with USB 3.2 Gen 1 speeds across the board.
Value winner: WAVLINK WL69PD25pro, decisively. The price difference is enormous for the incremental capability the Targus provides.
Verdict: WAVLINK WL69PD25pro Wins for Most Users
The WAVLINK WL69PD25pro delivers the better value proposition in this matchup. For $152.99, you get triple 4K@60Hz DisplayLink output, 100W laptop charging, faster USB-C ports, and a newer design. The Targus DOCK570USZ is not a bad dock - its quad 4K capability is genuinely unique - but at $482.99, it is a niche product for specific enterprise requirements.
Both docks share the same fundamental limitations of DisplayLink: mandatory driver installation, CPU overhead during display rendering, and unsuitability for gaming or latency-sensitive work. The question is purely whether that fourth 4K display is worth $330 to you.
Choose the WAVLINK WL69PD25pro if:
- Three 4K monitors are enough for your workflow
- Budget matters and you want the most display output per dollar
- You need faster USB-C ports for external storage (10 Gbps vs 5 Gbps)
- You use a MacBook and want to bypass the external display limit affordably
- You prefer newer hardware with a more current chipset
Choose the Targus DOCK570USZ if:
- You need exactly four simultaneous 4K external displays from a single USB-C connection
- Your IT department requires enterprise features like Wi-Fi Auto Switch and MAC Address Cloning
- You manage a mixed-OS fleet including Linux and Android devices
- The 3-year warranty is important for your deployment
- You have VESA mounting or Kensington lock requirements
For more details on each dock individually, read our Targus DOCK570USZ review and WAVLINK WL69PD25pro review. And if you are exploring other multi-monitor options, our guide on the best docking stations for home office covers additional recommendations.