UGREEN Revodok Pro 313 vs Pro 210 - USB-C Dock Comparison 2026

UGREEN Revodok Pro 313 vs Pro 210: the same idea at two sizes

The UGREEN Revodok Pro 313 and UGREEN Revodok Pro 210 are both USB-C docks for laptops that need more desktop ports without jumping to a Thunderbolt dock. They share the same basic approach: a built-in USB-C host cable, DisplayPort Alt Mode video, no DisplayLink driver, Gigabit Ethernet, card readers, and USB-C passthrough charging.

They also share the same biggest limitation. Neither dock is a magic fix for Mac multi-monitor setups. Both product YAML files say the docks rely on native USB-C display output and MST-style behavior. On Windows, that can mean extended external displays when the laptop supports the right video mode. On macOS, the extra external screens mirror instead of acting as separate extended desktops. If you need multiple extended displays from a base MacBook, look at a DisplayLink option in our best docking stations for dual monitors guide instead.

The short version: the Revodok Pro 313 is the better dock for most Windows desks. It scores 7.5 versus 7.2 for the Pro 210, adds a third video output, moves to 10Gbps USB on its faster ports, includes DisplayPort and audio, and still passes up to 85W to the laptop. The Pro 210 makes more sense when price, travel size, or a simple dual-HDMI setup matters more than speed and monitor flexibility.

Quick specs comparison

Why the Revodok Pro 313 wins overall

The Revodok Pro 313 wins because its advantages are practical, not cosmetic. It is the model that gives a Windows user more room to build a real desk setup: more video flexibility, faster USB, an audio jack, and one extra category of display output.

The score difference is small, 7.5 for the Pro 313 against 7.2 for the Pro 210, but the underlying spec difference is clear. The Pro 313 is a 10Gbps USB-C dock. The Pro 210 is a 5Gbps USB-C hub. That gap matters if you connect external SSDs, capture devices, fast card readers, or other peripherals that can use more than basic USB 3.0 bandwidth.

The Pro 313 also has a better monitor layout. Two HDMI ports and one DisplayPort output give you more choices than two HDMI ports alone. The product YAML lists support for up to three displays, with the realistic triple-display ceiling described as two 4K@60Hz screens plus a third 4K@30Hz screen on compatible modern hosts. The Pro 210 tops out at two displays through HDMI.

That does not make the Pro 313 a Thunderbolt replacement. Its own YAML is blunt about that. It is a 10Gbps USB-C dock, not Thunderbolt 3, Thunderbolt 4, or Thunderbolt 5. If you need full 40Gbps bandwidth, high refresh monitors, or fast storage chains, our USB-C vs Thunderbolt docking station guide is the better next read. But inside the USB-C MST category, the Pro 313 is the stronger model.

Display support: three outputs beat two, but the host decides

This is the main reason to choose the Pro 313.

The Pro 313 has two HDMI 2.0 ports and one DisplayPort 1.4 output. Its YAML lists single 4K@60Hz, dual 4K@60Hz, and triple-display support where the third 4K display may drop to 30Hz depending on the host. The notes call out DisplayPort Alt Mode, MST behavior, DSC, and HBR3-class bandwidth as the factors that determine what you actually get.

The Pro 210 has two HDMI 2.0 outputs. Its YAML lists single 8K@30Hz on compatible hosts, single 4K@60Hz, and dual 4K@60Hz. It is a useful dual-monitor hub for Windows laptops, but it has no DisplayPort output and no third video connector.

For a two-monitor office desk, both can work well on a compatible Windows laptop. For a three-monitor desk, the Pro 210 is simply the wrong product. It has two HDMI outputs and no third path. The Pro 313 is built for that job, with the usual USB-C bandwidth caveat.

The Mac story is the same on both models. The Pro 313 YAML says macOS mirrors the extra HDMI and DisplayPort outputs instead of extending them as independent desktops. The Pro 210 YAML says macOS mirrors the two HDMI outputs instead of using them as separate extended displays. That is not a UGREEN driver issue. These models do not use DisplayLink, so they do not bypass macOS MST limits.

Display winner: UGREEN Revodok Pro 313. It has all of the Pro 210’s dual-monitor logic plus a third output and DisplayPort.

USB and data speed: the Pro 313 has the faster desk ports

The Pro 313 is a better fit if your dock is more than a keyboard-and-mouse adapter.

Its USB layout has one USB-C 3.2 data port, two USB-A 3.2 ports, and two USB-A 3.0 ports. The product YAML describes three 10Gbps data ports, with the remaining USB-A ports better suited to lower speed accessories. That gives you reasonable room for an external SSD, webcam, USB microphone, keyboard receiver, and general desk peripherals.

The Pro 210 is more basic. It has one USB-C 3.0 port, one USB-A 3.0 port, and two USB-A 2.0 ports. That is fine for mice, keyboards, receivers, printers, and occasional file transfers. It is not ideal if you use external storage every day. The YAML calls out 5Gbps USB data as a con because it is noticeably slower than 10Gbps USB-C and Thunderbolt docks.

This is also where the price difference starts to feel justified. The Pro 210 is cheaper, but the Pro 313 gives the busier desk a more realistic mix of fast and slow ports. You can reserve the fastest ports for storage and keep the slower ones for accessories that do not need bandwidth.

USB winner: UGREEN Revodok Pro 313. The Pro 210 is enough for simple peripherals, but the Pro 313 is less cramped and faster.

Charging: same 85W ceiling, same missing charger caveat

Charging is a tie.

Both docks use USB-C passthrough power. Both accept up to 100W from a USB-C charger and pass up to 85W to the laptop. Both reserve power for the dock and attached peripherals. Neither product YAML lists an included power adapter.

That means you should not compare these two on laptop charging. A 13-inch or 14-inch ultrabook will usually be fine at 85W. A heavier workstation laptop may still drain under sustained load. If you buy either dock and want full passthrough charging, plan on using a 100W USB-C charger.

The difference is not wattage. The difference is what else the dock gives you while passing that 85W. The Pro 313 gives you more display and data flexibility. The Pro 210 gives you a lower-cost dual-HDMI hub with the same charging ceiling.

Power winner: tie. Both pass up to 85W when paired with the right charger.

Ethernet, card readers, and audio

Both models cover the basics. Each has Gigabit Ethernet. Each has SD and microSD card readers. Each is useful for a home office setup where you want wired networking and quick card access without a pile of adapters.

The Pro 313 adds a 3.5mm combo audio jack. The Pro 210 does not have an audio jack, and its YAML lists that as a con. You can still use HDMI audio, Bluetooth headphones, or a USB audio adapter with the Pro 210, but that uses another port and makes the desk a little messier.

The card reader specs also differ in wording. The Pro 313 YAML stores the readers as SD 3.0 class and microSD / TF. The Pro 210 YAML lists SD 3.0 / UHS-I up to 104 MB/s for both SD and microSD. The practical takeaway is simple: both cover normal SD and microSD use, but neither is positioned as a high-end creator dock with Thunderbolt bandwidth.

Everyday ports winner: UGREEN Revodok Pro 313, mainly because it includes audio and more fast USB ports. Ethernet and card reader coverage are otherwise close.

Windows and Mac compatibility

Both docks make the most sense with Windows laptops that have USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode. The Pro 313 is best for a Windows desk that might use two or three monitors. The Pro 210 is best for a Windows desk that only needs one or two HDMI monitors.

Neither dock is ideal for a Mac user who wants multiple independent external displays. The Pro 210 can add Ethernet, USB-A, card readers, charging, and one HDMI display to a MacBook Air. The Pro 313 can add a similar set of desk ports and one mirrored external display setup. What they cannot do is make macOS treat multiple MST outputs as separate extended desktops.

ChromeOS and Linux are more device dependent. Both YAML files list ChromeOS and Linux compatibility notes, but display behavior depends on the host’s USB-C video implementation. The Pro 210 YAML also lists Android support subject to the device’s desktop mode and display output support. That is useful if you experiment with tablets, but it should not drive the buying decision for most people.

Compatibility winner: tie for the platform warning, Pro 313 for Windows monitor flexibility. Both need the right USB-C video host, and both are poor choices for multiple extended Mac displays.

Price and value

The Pro 210 has the obvious price advantage. Its MSRP is $69.99. The Pro 313’s MSRP is $129.99. If your setup is a basic Windows laptop with two HDMI monitors, Ethernet, SD cards, a keyboard, a mouse, and passthrough charging, the Pro 210 is the more economical answer.

The Pro 313 earns its higher price when the setup is busier. You are paying for the third video output, DisplayPort, 10Gbps USB, more fast USB-A capacity, audio, and a slightly better overall score. Those are not minor upgrades if the dock sits on your desk every day.

I would not buy the Pro 313 only because it has a bigger number in the name. Buy it because you specifically need at least one of these things: three video outputs, DisplayPort, 10Gbps USB, or an audio jack. If you do not need those, the Pro 210 is the cleaner value pick.

Value winner: conditional. Pro 210 for a cheap dual-HDMI hub. Pro 313 for a fuller Windows desk dock.

Which one should you buy?

Choose the UGREEN Revodok Pro 313 if:

• You want up to three external displays on a compatible Windows laptop.
• You need DisplayPort in addition to HDMI.
• You use external storage or other accessories that benefit from 10Gbps USB.
• You want a 3.5mm audio jack built into the dock.
• You are building a permanent desk setup and want more room to grow.
• You can confirm your laptop’s USB-C port supports DisplayPort Alt Mode with enough bandwidth for your target monitors.

Choose the UGREEN Revodok Pro 210 if:

• You only need one or two HDMI monitors.
• Price matters more than USB speed.
• Your USB devices are mostly keyboards, mice, receivers, printers, and occasional storage.
• You want the same 85W charging ceiling in a cheaper hub.
• You prefer the longer 35cm built-in cable noted in the product YAML.
• You do not need DisplayPort or a 3.5mm audio jack.

Skip both if:

• You need multiple extended external displays on a MacBook.
• Your laptop’s USB-C port does not support DisplayPort Alt Mode.
• You need Thunderbolt bandwidth for fast storage chains or high-end monitor setups.
• You want a dock with its own included power brick.

Verdict: buy the Revodok Pro 313 unless your setup is simple

The Revodok Pro 313 is the better dock in this comparison. The YAML-backed reasons are straightforward: higher score, 10Gbps host connection, three video outputs instead of two, DisplayPort, more fast USB ports, audio, and the same 85W charging ceiling as the cheaper model.

The Revodok Pro 210 is still a good buy when the desk is simple. It gives you dual HDMI, Ethernet, card readers, basic USB, and 85W passthrough charging at a much lower MSRP. For a budget Windows office setup, that may be all you need.

For most buyers comparing these two, though, the question is whether the Pro 313’s upgrades are worth paying for. If you use more than two monitors, want DisplayPort, or move data through the dock regularly, yes. If your setup is two HDMI monitors and ordinary peripherals, save the money and buy the Pro 210.

For more context on dock classes, read our docking station buying guide, our best docks for triple monitors guide, and the individual reviews for the UGREEN Revodok Pro 313 and UGREEN Revodok Pro 210.